Membumikan Khilafah di Indonesia: Strategi Mobilisasi Opini Publik oleh Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) di Media Sosial

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Paelani Setia

Abstract

Social media, with its openness, provides new cyberspace that religious organizations use in conveying their religious messages, including the religious message of the Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) organization. This paper aims to discuss the strategy of Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) in influencing public opinion on social media after it was dissolved by the government through Perppu Ormas Number 2 of 2017. This study uses a qualitative method with data collection through online observations, field observations, interviews, and document reviews. This paper finds that HTI's struggle to ground the Khilafah ideology on social media is quite successful because it can take advantage of the momentum of national political dynamics. While social media is used as an essential instrument for disseminating Khilafah's opinion, various cases of post-truth political practice were also found. Unfortunately, the assumption that social media is safe for HTI, but that assumption has not been proven true. The criminal penalties received by its members have become a new threat to HTI on social media.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Abdel-Fadil, M. (2019). The politics of affect: The glue of religious and identity conflicts in social media. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 8(1), 11–34.
  2. Afadlal, Irewati, A., Mashad, D., Zaenuddin, D., Purwoko, D., Turmudi, E., … Sihbudi, R. (2005). Islam dan Radikalisme di Indonesia (1st ed.). Jakarta: LIPI Press.
  3. Affan, M., & Thohir, A. (2020). Studying Religion Through the Internet among Millennial Muslims: Causes and Consequences. FIKRAH, 8(1), 43–52.
  4. Ahnaf, M. I. (2016). Tiga Jalan Islam Politik di Indonesia: Reformasi, Refolusi dan Revolusi. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya. https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v1i2.728
  5. Akhiyat, A., & Usuluddin, W. (2019). Negera Utopia eks Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia. Surabaya: Imtiyaz.
  6. Al-Kandari, A. A., & Dashti, A. (2014). Fatwa and the internet: a study of the influence of Muslim religious scholars on internet diffusion in Saudi Arabia. Prometheus, 32(2), 127–144.
  7. Alles, D. (2016). Transnational Islamic Actors and Indonesia’s Foreign Policy. London and New York: Routledge (Taylor and Francis Group).
  8. Arifan, F. A. (2014). Paham Keagamaan Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Sosial, 6(2), 94–102.
  9. Armfield, G. G., & Holbert, R. L. (2003). The relationship between religiosity and Internet use. Journal of Media and Religion, 2(3), 129–144.
  10. Atmadja, N. B., & Ariyani, L. P. S. (2018). Sosiologi Media: Perspektif Teori Kritis. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  11. Ayoob, M. (2008). The Many Faces of Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Muslim World. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
  12. Barker, J. (2015). Guerilla engineers: The Internet and the politics of freedom in Indonesia. In Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power (pp. 199–218). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  13. Brandon, J. (2006). Hizb-ut-Tahrir’s Growing Appeal in the Arab World. Terrorism Monitor, 2(24).
  14. Briandana, R., Doktoralina, C. M., Hassan, S. A., & Hasan, W. N. W. (2020). Da’wah Communication and Social Media: The Interpretation of Millennials in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), 8(1), 216–226.
  15. Bubalo, A., & Fealy, G. (2007). Jejak Kafilah: Pengaruh Radikalisme Timur Tengah di Indonesia. Mizan Pustaka.
  16. Bunt, G. R. (2000). Virtually Islamic: Computer-mediated communication and cyber Islamic environments. Wales: University of Wales Press.
  17. Bunt, G. R. (2003). Islam in the digital age: E-jihad, online fatwas and cyber Islamic environments. London: Pluto Press.
  18. Commins, D. (1991). Taqi al-Din al-Nabhani and the Islamic Liberation Party. The Muslim World, 81(3–4).
  19. Dulkiah, M., & Setia, P. (2020). Pola Penyebaran Hoaks pada Kalangan Mahasiswa Perguruan Tinggi Islam di Kota Bandung. Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, Dan Tradisi), 6(2), 1–16.
  20. Ervianto, T. (2017). Melawan Hoax, Mencegah Perpecahan Bangsa. Retrieved 15 June 2021, from Detik.com website: https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-3506151/melawan-hoax-mencegah-perpecahan-bangsa
  21. Evolvi, G. (2018). Hate in a tweet: Exploring internet-based islamophobic discourses. Religions, 9(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9100307
  22. Fajrlan. (2019). LIPI: Jawa Barat, Aceh, dan Banten Tertinggi Informasi Hoaks. Retrieved 15 June 2021, from CNN Indonesia website: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20190118175011-20-362017/lipi-jawa-barat-aceh-dan-banten-tertinggi-informasi-hoaks
  23. Fazaeli, M., Shakibnezhad, E., & Karami, M. (2020). Religious Freedom in Cyberspace and its Impact on International Peace and Security: With Some References to Islamic Teachings. Journal of Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law, 6(4), 89–111.
  24. Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale: Yale University Press.
  25. Gramsci, A. (2013). Prison Notebooks Catatan-catatan dari Penjara (T. W. Utomo, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  26. Heryanto, G. G., Wahyudin, A., Zamroni, M., Ali, M., & Hefni, H. (2017). Melawan Hoax di Media Sosial dan Media Massa (A. Wahyudin & M. Sunuantari, Eds.). Yogyakarta: Trustmedia Publishing dan ASKOPIS PRESS.
  27. Homans, G. C. (1974). Elementary Forms of Social Behavior (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  28. Iqbal, Asep M. (2020). Challenging moderate Islam in Indonesia: NU Garis Lurus and its construction of the “authentic” NU online. In Rising Islamic Conservatism inIndonesia (pp. 95–115). Routledge.
  29. Iqbal, Asep Muhamad. (2017). Cyber-activism and the Islamic Salafi movement in Indonesia. Murdoch University.
  30. Iqbal, Asep Muhamad, & Zulkifli. (2016). Islamic fundamentalism, nationstate and global citizenship: The case of Hizb ut-Tahrir. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 6(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v6i1.35-61
  31. Kementerian Agama RI. (2019). Moderasi Beragama. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI.
  32. Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography. London: Sage.
  33. Lubis, H. M. R. (2017). Sosiologi Agama: Memahami Perkembangan Agama dalam Interaksi Islam. jakarta: Kencana.
  34. Lupton, D. (2017). Digital Sociology. New York, USA: Routledge (Taylor and Francis Group). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315776880
  35. Mahfud, C., Prasetyawati, N., Wahyuddin, W., Muhibbin, Z., Agustin, D. S. Y., & Sukmawati, H. (2018). Religious Radicalism, Global Terrorism and Islamic Challenges in Contemporary Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora (JSH), 11(1), 8–18.
  36. Malik, S. (2004). For Allah and the Caliphate. Retrieved 15 June 2021, from New Statesman website: https://www.newstatesman.com/node/195114
  37. Manik, E. S., & Hasanuddin, H. (2018). Strategi Politik Hizbut Tahrir dalam Menegakkan Khilafah Islam di Indonesia. Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 17(1), 61–96.
  38. National Intelligence Council. (2004). Mapping the Global Future: Report of the National Intelligence Council’s 2020 Project, Based on Consultations with Nongovernmental Experts Around the World. Pittsburgh: US Government Printing Office.
  39. Osman, M. N. M. (2010). Reviving the Caliphate in the Nusantara: Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia’s mobilization strategy and its impact in Indonesia. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(4), 601–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2010.496317
  40. Poloma, M. M. (2013). Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  41. Prasetyanto, A., & Kusumadewi, A. (2018). Mengurai Jejaring Muslim Cyber Army. Retrieved 15 June 2021, from Kumparan website: https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/mengurai-jejaring-muslim-cyber-army
  42. Ritzer, G. (2014). Teori Sosiologi dari Sosiologi Klasik sampai Perkembangan Terakhir Postmodern (8th ed.). Yogyajarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  43. Rusli, R. (2020). The Role of Family in Preventing Social Conflict in Society From Islamic Perspectives. Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika, 17(1), 108–122.
  44. Salgado, S. (2018). Online media impact on politics. Views on post-truth politics and postpostmodernism. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 14(3), 317–331.
  45. Sardarnia, K., & Safizadeh, R. (2019). The internet and its potentials for networking and identity seeking: A study on ISIS. Terrorism and Political Violence, 31(6), 1266–1283.
  46. Sari, S. (2019). Literasi media pada generasi milenial di era digital. Jurnal Professional FIS UNIVED, 6(2), 30–42.
  47. Setia, P., & Dilawati, R. (2021). Tren Baru Islam melalui Gerakan Hijrah: Studi Kasus Shift Pemuda Hijrah. Khazanah Theologia, 3(3), 131–146.
  48. Setiawan, T., & Risnandar, A. (2019). Negara Modern, dan Utopia Negara Khilafah (?). Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam, 2(2), 6–12.
  49. Setyawan, F. A. (2017). Pemerintah Resmi Cabut SK Badan Hukum HTI. Retrieved 15 June 2021, from CNN Indonesia website: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20170719100715-12-228811/pemerintah-resmi-cabut-sk-badan-hukum-hti
  50. Solahudin, D., & Fakhruroji, M. (2019). Internet and Islamic Learning Practices in Indonesia: Social Media, Religious Populism, and Religious Authority. Religions, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11010019
  51. Sørensen, J. K. (2020). Personalised universalism in the age of algorithms. In Universalism in Public Service Media: RIPE@ 2019 (pp. 191–205). Nordicom.
  52. Suiter, J. (2016). Post-truth politics. Political Insight, 7(3), 25–27.
  53. Sultan, O. (2017). Combatting the Rise of ISIS 2.0 and Terrorism 3.0. The Cyber Defense Review, 2(3), 41–50.
  54. Wahid, M. I. (2020). Dari Tradisional Menuju Digital : Adopsi Internet oleh Nahdlatul Ulama Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Masyarakat, 16(01), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.23971/jsam.v16i1.1745
  55. Wuryanta, A. G. E. W. (2018). Post-Truth, Cyber Identity dan Defisit Demokrasi. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/up96m