Performing Body Positivity: A Dramaturgical Analysis of the Fat Acceptance Movement in Digital Spaces
Mengekspresikan Positivitas Tubuh: Analisis Dramaturgis Gerakan Penerimaan Tubuh Gemuk di Ruang Digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57032/jsd.v6i1.345Keywords:
Social media, gender,, hoax, digital literacy, critical thinking, disruption.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the construction, production, and negotiation of the fat acceptance movement within digital spaces, utilizing visual communication practices and social media interactions. The research is important due to the increasing influence of digital platforms in shaping perceptions of the body, self-identity, and current beauty standards. Employing a qualitative approach with virtual ethnography, the study gathers data through digital observation of influencer content, analysis of audience comments, and visual documentation. Emerging patterns in communication and interaction were identified through a thematic analysis of the data. The results indicate that the fat acceptance movement operates as both a social campaign and a performative act. In this context, influencers strategically build identities using carefully selected visuals and positive narratives, while audiences engage by either supporting or challenging these interpretations. The research also highlights persistent conflicts between narratives of body acceptance and prevailing health discussions. The findings of this study advance digital sociology and the use of dramaturgical theory in online settings, while also informing the creation of more inclusive digital literacy practices. The originality of this study lies in its micro-interactional approach, integrating dramaturgical analysis to examine the dynamics of platform-based social movements
References
Abidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t These Just Young, Rich Women Doing Vain Things Online?”: Influencer Selfies as Subversive Frivolity. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 2056305116641342. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641342
Afful, A. A., & Ricciardelli, R. (2015). Shaping The Online Fat Acceptance Movement: Talking About Body Image and Beauty Standards. Journal of Gender Studies, 24(4), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1028523
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2015). Communication in Movements. In The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements (pp. 367–382). Oxford University Press Oxford.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). A Social Critique of The Judgement of Taste. Cambridge Publishing.
Boyd, D. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706Q063OA
Castells, M. (2010). Globalisation, Networking, Urbanisation: Reflections on the Spatial Dynamics of the Information Age. Urban Studies, 47(13), 2737–2745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010377365
Cohen, R., Irwin, L., Newton-John, T., & Slater, A. (2019). #BodyPositivity: A content analysis of body positive accounts on Instagram. Body Image, 29, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.02.007
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Polity Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publication.
Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring The Credibility of Online Celebrities’ Instagram Profiles in Influencing The Purchase Decisions of Young Female Users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009
Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who Are The Social Media Influencers? A Study of Public Perceptions of Personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.11.001
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and The Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. Pluto Books.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books.
Hine, C. (2015). Mixed Methods and Multimodal Research and Internet Technologies. In The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry (Issue 28, pp. 503–521). University of Surrey.
Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2016). Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in A Networked Culture. New York University Press.
Kress, G. (2015). Semiotic Work: Applied Linguistics and A Social Semiotic Account of Multimodality. AILA Review, 28(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1075 /aila.28.03kre
Maguire, J. S., & Matthews, J. (2012). Are We All Cultural Intermediaries Now? An Introduction to Cultural Intermediaries in Context. In European journal of cultural studies (Vol. 15, Issue 5, pp. 551–562). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549412445762
Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2011). To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter. Convergence, 17(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856510394539
Marwick, A. E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury Selfies in The Attention Economy. Public Culture, 27(1), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press.
Pink, S., Sinanan, J., Hjorth, L., & Horst, H. (2016). Tactile Digital Ethnography: Researching Mobile Media Through The Hand. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(2), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157915619958
Poell, T., & Van Dijck, J. (2018). Social Media and New Protest Movements. In The Sage Handbook of Social Media (p. 561). SAGE Publication Inc.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rasdica Denara Hernowo Puteri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
