Improving the Quality of Educational Services Through the Utilization of Learning Resources and the Effectiveness of Teacher Performance Peningkatan Mutu Layanan Pendidikan Melalui Pemanfaatna Sumber Belajar dan Efektivitas Kinerja Guru Section Articles

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 31, 2025
https://doi.org/10.57032/jsd.v5i1.304
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Novianti Azizah Rahman
Universitas Sindang Kasih Majalengka

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of learning resource utilization and teacher effectiveness on the quality of educational services in elementary schools. The study was conducted using a quantitative descriptive method, involving 47 teachers from Cakrabuana Elementary School Cluster IV, Talun District, Cirebon Regency. Data were collected through questionnaires, observations, and interviews, and analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression. The results showed that learning resource utilization had a significant relationship with the quality of educational services (r = 0.663), as did teacher effectiveness (r = 0.752). Simultaneously, both contributed 69.1% to the quality of educational services (R² = 0.691; F = 49.313; p < 0.05). These findings indicate that the success of basic education delivery is largely determined by the extent to which teachers are able to utilize available learning resources and carry out their roles professionally and effectively. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of developing teacher capacity and the availability of learning resources that support innovative learning as an integral part of efforts to continuously improve the quality of basic education services.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Al-Thani, W. A., Ari, I., & Koç, M. (2021). Education as a critical factor of sustainability: Case study in Qatar from the teachers’ development perspective. Sustainability, 13(20), 11525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011525
  2. Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Revisi). Jakarta, Indonesia: Rineka Cipta.
  3. Basir, A., Khamdanah, K., Umaemah, A., & Rizka, H. (2024). Implementing the Hello Talk application to teach speaking skills in vocational high schools. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v3i2.108
  4. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2022). Managing teaching and learning in schools. SAGE Publications.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  6. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
  7. Donkoh, R., Lee, W. O., Ahoto, A. T., Donkor, J., Twerefoo, P. O., Akotey, M. K., & Ntim, S. Y. (2023). Effects of educational management on quality education in rural and urban primary schools in Ghana. Heliyon, 9(11), e21325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21325
  8. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  9. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang, Indonesia: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  10. Hamidah, L. Y., Wahidin, D., & Handayani, S. (2022). Penguatan pendidikan karakter cinta lingkungan melalui pembelajaran dengan memanfaatkan media loose parts pada anak usia dini. Edukasi: Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.57032/edukasi.v2i1.123
  11. Hidayat, H., Sukandar, A., & Setiawan, M. (2022). Manajemen supervisi kepala madrasah untuk meningkatkan profesionalisme guru pendidikan agama Islam. Edukasi: Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 194–213. https://doi.org/10.57032/edukasi.v2i2.135
  12. Ho, C. S. M., & Lee, D. H. L. (2023). The effect of authority transitions on teachers’ entrepreneurial behavior. Teacher Development, 27(3), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2023.2182829
  13. Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar: Transformasi pendidikan nasional. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kemendikbudristek.
  14. Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Profil pendidikan Indonesia tahun 2023. Jakarta, Indonesia: Pusdatin.
  15. Makawimbang, J. (2011). Manajemen pendidikan dan mutu pelayanan. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Graha Ilmu.
  16. Meng, N., Dong, Y., Roehrs, D., & Luan, L. (2023). Tackle implementation challenges in project-based learning: A survey study of PBL e-learning platforms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(3), 1179–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10202-7
  17. Notoatmodjo, S. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kesehatan. Jakarta, Indonesia: Rineka Cipta.
  18. OECD. (2020). Learning in the 21st century: Trends and research. OECD Publishing.
  19. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  20. Sallis, E. (2021). Total quality management in education. London, England: Routledge.
  21. Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (2011). Motivation and work behavior. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  22. Sudjana, N., & Rivai, A. (2013). Media pengajaran. Bandung, Indonesia: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
  23. Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta.
  24. Suja, I. W., Sudiana, I. K., Redhana, I. W., & Sudria, I. B. N. (2021). Mental model of prospective chemistry teachers on electrolyte and nonelectrolyte solutions. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1115(1), 012064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1115/1/012064
  25. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing.